{"id":517,"date":"2011-07-21T11:23:45","date_gmt":"2011-07-21T16:23:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/tracking1000datasets\/?p=270"},"modified":"2013-05-09T01:07:24","modified_gmt":"2013-05-09T01:07:24","slug":"updated-tagging-structure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/data-reuse\/updated-tagging-structure\/","title":{"rendered":"Updated Tagging Structure"},"content":{"rendered":"

I just updated the tagging structure so it shows what was actually applied and better defined some of the tags. \u00a0The updated tagging structure is below with tags in italics:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tags for Use in Mendeley<\/strong> <\/p>\n
    \n
  1. How was the article found?\n
      \n
    1. data cited<\/em> – the article was found through Google Scholar through an unique dataset identifier search<\/li>\n
    2. WoS<\/em> – the article was found through Web of Science for citing the data collection article<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
    3. Attribution Location – for GS results (these were not applied to WoS articles)\n
        \n
      1. attribution in reference<\/em><\/li>\n
      2. attribution in caption<\/em><\/li>\n
      3. attribution in text<\/em><\/li>\n
      4. attribution in table<\/em><\/li>\n
      5. attribution in footnote<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
      6. Attribution Location – for WoS results\n
          \n
        1. repository mentioned<\/em> – when repository is mentioned in association with the selected dataset<\/li>\n
        2. accession mentioned<\/em> – when accession number is mentioned<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
        3. Dataset reuse classification\n
            \n
          1. dataset not reused<\/em>\n
              \n
            1. example of dataset<\/li>\n
            2. cites data collection article but does not reuse and\/or mention dataset<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
            3. dataset reused<\/em>\n
                \n
              1. dataset reused as example<\/em> – when the dataset is randomly chosen to show how to do something with a dataset<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
              2. dataset reuse ambiguous<\/em> – dataset may be reused, but difficult to tell on first analysis<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
              3. Confidence of dataset reuse classification\n
                  \n
                1. high confidence<\/em><\/li>\n
                2. medium confidence<\/em><\/li>\n
                3. low confidence<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
                4. Other housekeeping tags\n
                    \n
                  1. feedback please<\/em> – for articles where the dataset reuse decision could use a second opinion<\/li>\n
                  2. no full-text access<\/em> – unable to access the full-text online or through my library\u2019s electronic holdings<\/li>\n
                  3. import error<\/em> – incomplete citations; unable to find the rest of the citation<\/li>\n
                  4. nice example<\/em> – used to denote articles that cite the dataset in a good or interesting way<\/li>\n
                  5. multiple datasets cited<\/em> – when an article cites more than one dataset that we are tracking; only applied to Google Scholar imported articles, and not 100% consistent with application<\/li>\n
                  6. does not cite dataset<\/em> – for articles found through Google Scholar that do not actually refer to the dataset<\/li>\n
                  7. does not cite article<\/em> – for articles found through Web of Science that do not actually cite the data collection article<\/li>\n
                  8. same author<\/em> – for articles that share the same author with the dataset (mostly only applied to articles that reuse the dataset, though applied to some articles that do not reuse the dataset<\/li>\n
                  9. article pre-2005<\/em> – for articles that were published before the dataset was made public and thus cannot be reusing the dataset in its published form<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

                     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                    I just updated the tagging structure so it shows what was actually applied and better defined some of the tags. \u00a0The updated tagging structure is below with tags in italics:   Tags for Use in Mendeley  How was the article found? data cited – the article was found through Google Continue reading Updated Tagging Structure<\/span>→<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=517"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":527,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/517\/revisions\/527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}