{"id":516,"date":"2011-06-20T16:48:17","date_gmt":"2011-06-20T21:48:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/tracking1000datasets\/?p=174"},"modified":"2013-05-09T01:17:13","modified_gmt":"2013-05-09T01:17:13","slug":"june-20-2011-tracking-bmrb","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/data-reuse\/june-20-2011-tracking-bmrb\/","title":{"rendered":"June 20, 2011 – Tracking BMRB"},"content":{"rendered":"

Most of today was spent tracking the Biological\u00a0Magnetic\u00a0Resonance\u00a0Data\u00a0Bank (BMRB) ID numbers in Google Scholar.\u00a0 It was really hard getting rid of the “chatter” in the search results and determining which citations actually cited the dataset based on the small blurb on Google Scholar.\u00a0 I collected 77 articles that potentially cited the dataset.\u00a0 However, after collecting the full-text for the 73 articles for which I had access, 64 did not actually cite the dataset.\u00a0 This is the major downfall of having a plain 4+ digit number as the repository specific ID number for each dataset; it gets really difficult to search for that particular dataset cited within the literature.\u00a0 However, I did find 9 articles that reused the datasets so all was not a total waste.\u00a0 The Google Scholar search terms used and number of relevant hits can be seen in this Google Spreadsheet<\/a>.\u00a0 The citations for the articles can be found in this Mendeley group<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I also spent some time fine tuning the search string for the Protein Data Bank ID numbers in order to get all the PDB cited articles while getting rid of a lot of non-relevant results.\u00a0 I ended up with the search string: (PDB OR “Protein Data Bank”) AND “1TL6” -heinonline -patents; where 1TL6 is the dataset ID.\u00a0 The -heinonline ruled out a lot of non-related government documents and the -patents rules out any patents or patent applications.\u00a0 Search terms fro the PDB can be found in this Google Spreadsheet<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Most of today was spent tracking the Biological\u00a0Magnetic\u00a0Resonance\u00a0Data\u00a0Bank (BMRB) ID numbers in Google Scholar.\u00a0 It was really hard getting rid of the “chatter” in the search results and determining which citations actually cited the dataset based on the small blurb on Google Scholar.\u00a0 I collected 77 articles that potentially cited Continue reading June 20, 2011 – Tracking BMRB<\/span>→<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=516"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":558,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/516\/revisions\/558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}