{"id":266,"date":"2011-07-20T13:41:28","date_gmt":"2011-07-20T18:41:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/tracking1000datasets\/?p=266"},"modified":"2013-05-09T01:07:24","modified_gmt":"2013-05-09T01:07:24","slug":"july-20-2011-choosing-a-10th-repository","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/notebooks.dataone.org\/data-reuse\/july-20-2011-choosing-a-10th-repository\/","title":{"rendered":"July 20, 2011 – Choosing a 10th Repository"},"content":{"rendered":"
Yesterday, Heather and I met on Skype to discuss choosing a 10th repository for the study. \u00a0We discussed not including the Journal Archive set of repositories in the total collection and adding two more repositories instead of 1 to make up the total of 10 repositories in the study.<\/p>\n
As Todd suggested, we created a chart\u00a0describing\u00a0the attributes of all the repositories included so far which can be viewed here<\/a>.<\/p>\n So far we have collected data on 960 datasets including the 168 included in the Journal Archive set. \u00a0IQSS and ICPSR repositories, which are currently combined to count as 1 repository in the study only have a combined total of 22 datasets. \u00a0I am wondering if we should combine these with the Journal Archive repositories<\/a> for a total of 190 datasets and count this as 2 repositories, or add two additional repositories to our study, most likely HepData<\/a> and SimBad<\/a>.<\/p>\n Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yesterday, Heather and I met on Skype to discuss choosing a 10th repository for the study. \u00a0We discussed not including the Journal Archive set of repositories in the total collection and adding two more repositories instead of 1 to make up the total of 10 repositories in the study. As Continue reading July 20, 2011 – Choosing a 10th Repository<\/span>